Pfizer Wants To Use Covid Vaccine In Children Aged 6 Months To 4 Years Amidst Scandal Involving Devastating Data Revealed By Controversial Study

Pfizer Wants To Use Covid Vaccine In Children Aged 6 Months To 4 Years Amidst Scandal Involving Devastating Data Revealed By Controversial Study
SHARE

We keep living under the sign of the novel coronavirus for more than two years now. Even though this nightmare seems to get closer and closer to its end, the headlines all over the world still include the terrible subject.

Now, it seems that Pfizer is all over the news again, and this time, the giant company is making headlines after applying for authorization to use its covid mRNA vaccine in kids aged six months to four years old. 

Pfizer wants to have its vaccine used in kids aged 6 months to 4 years old 

Daily Mail notes that Pfizer and its partner, BioNTech, have officially submitted data to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to have its vaccine authorized for use in children aged six months to four years old.

The company has just revealed the planned move, following reports earlier in the day that the regulatory agency was urging them to submit an application soon.

The online publication mentioned above notes the fact that this would also make the U.S. the world’s only nation to approve the Pfizer vaccine for children under five.

They also claim that some doubt the shot is needed for people that young due to the little risk they face from the virus.

“Ultimately, we believe that three doses of the vaccine will be needed for children 6 months through 4 years of age to achieve high levels of protection against current and potential future variants.”

This is what Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said. He continued and revealed:

‘If two doses are authorized, parents will have the opportunity to begin a COVID-19 vaccination series for their children while awaiting potential authorization of a third dose.”

New controversial study shows mind-blowing, potentially devastating vaccine results 

There is a new scientific study that has been published last month in Research Gate which shows mind-blowing covid vaccine potential results.

Of course, this will turn out to be surrounded by tons of controversies, just like any other subject involving the covid vaccines and especially their potential side effects. 

Twitter is fuming, revealing data from the study.

In the study’s abstract, the authors address the mRNA covid 19 vaccines and possible results.

“both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2. As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses. In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.”

The authors continued and revealing the following the study’s abstract:

“We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.”

Devastating potential outcomes are revealed in the study’s results:

“These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis.”

The study’s authors drop the conclusion, saying that the outcomes are elements suggesting that the risks outweigh the benefits of the vaccines:

“We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.”

One of the experts of the study dropped the following tweet:

It’s worth noting the fact that this new study has already led to some voices claiming it lacks credibility. 

 

Below, you can check out the study’s authors: 


McCullough has been making headlines recently after visiting Joe Rogan‘s podcast – another controversial name that’s been popping up all over the news.

Rogan has been getting a lot of support online following all the backlash he received after making the latest podcasts. His supporters are talking about the importance of freedom of speech and the freedom an individual has to get information as well. 

Elon Musk is another important name who addressed the importance of freedom amidst the changes that are taking place all over the world and seemingly strip people of their basic rights. 

Pfizer is involved in more scandals since the beginning of this pandemic – our publication has recently addressed that it’s been reported the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will have eight months — not the 75 years it requested — to release all documents related to the licensing of Pfizer’s Comirnaty covid vaccine. This is what a federal judge ruled.

The controversies involving the novel coronavirus, stringent measures, viable treatments, and the covid vaccines continue, so stay tuned for more data involving this “new reality” we’ve been living in for the past two years. Also, make sure to remain safe. 


SHARE
Rada Mateescu

Passionate about subjects from the science and health-related areas, Rada has been blogging for about ten years and at Health Thoroughfare, she's covering the latest news on these niches.

Post Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.