Shocking Revelation In The EU: “Experts” Were Working On Covid-19 And Useless Vaccines Since The ’60s

Shocking Revelation In The EU: “Experts” Were Working On Covid-19 And Useless Vaccines Since The ’60s

It seems that things are even worse than we imagined. “Experts” have been working on covid-19 since the ’60s. Check out the following video that will definitely blow your mind.

Shocking news about the covid-19 and vaccines

Here’s dr. David Martin in the EU during the International Covid Summit.

The EU Parliament held the International COVID-19 Summit III in Brussels, Belgium, earlier this month.

In a recent address to the European Parliament, a US businessman specializing in patent auditing David Martin claimed that COVID-19 was not a natural occurrence but a calculated act of “biological warfare and a financial heist. Nature was hijacked, science was hijacked.”

In his presentation in front of the EU parliament, Martin argued that the pandemic we said happened in the last few years did not overnight, citing sources in the public domain.

According to him, the coronavirus was first identified in 1965 and serves as a model pathogen. In addition, they learned that coronaviruses can be modified.

According to Martin, “Later we started learning how to modify a coronavirus by putting them in animals such as dogs and pigs,” and this led to the development of the first coronavirus spike protein vaccine by the US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer in 1990.

The medical community and pharmaceutical companies soon discovered that the vaccines were not effective.

In 2002, a university in North Carolina initiated a study to develop an “infectious replication defective,” which Martin interpreted as “a weapon to target individuals, but not have collateral damage.”

Characterizing the project as having “mysteriously preceded SARS by a year,” Martin said the coronavirus that caused the highly deadly infection was not from China and that it was “engineered” instead of naturally occurring.

More on covid vaccines

It has been revealed the fact that women vaccinated with the Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are at higher risk of vaginal bleeding, according to a new study.

“One or more doses of the messenger RNA shots increased the risk of bleeding in women aged 12 to 74, Swedish researchers reported in the study, published on May 3 by the British Medical Journal,” The Epoch Times notes. 

Adjustments to the data resulted in the removal of some of the heightened risks, but even after adjustments, younger women were still more likely to experience bleeding after the first and third doses, and older women were more likely to suffer from the issue after the first, second, and third doses.

“A number of studies, primarily based on self-reporting of symptoms, have identified menstrual irregularities and bleeding as potential side effects of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. People have also filed reports to various reporting systems, such as the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, and Israeli officials found signs that Pfizer’s vaccine causes menstrual issues.”

We suggest that you check out more details about this in the original article. 

According to the latest reports, Pfizer knew back in 2021 that the mRNA vaccines would be passed to newborns via breastfeeding. Check out the latest reports below.

Pfizer knew about the disasters of covid vaccines

It’s been just revealed that Pfizer knew about the disasters involved in the covid vaccines back in 2021. Take a look at this relevant tweet below in order to find out more about this.

You can find out more about the details here.

According to the notes, “The batch of Pfizer clinical trial documents released in April 2023 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under court order contains a shocking, eight-page document titled, “Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review.” The data in the Cumulative Review span “…from the time of drug product development to 28-FEB-2021.” A Pfizer employee, Robert T. Maroko, approved the Review on April 20, 2021.”

More than that, it’s been also revealed the fact that “Maternal exposure” is defined on pp. 1-2 as: “PTs Maternal exposure timing unspecified, Maternal exposure during pregnancy, Maternal exposure before pregnancy, Exposure during pregnancy.” These definitions imply that Pfizer may have been looking at damage to women and babies that could result from intercourse, inhalation, and skin contact prior to pregnancy, as Pfizer defines “exposure” including all three in its protocol.”

Rada Mateescu

Passionate about freedom, truth, humanity, and subjects from the science and health-related areas, Rada has been blogging for about ten years, and at Health Thoroughfare, she's covering the latest news on these niches.

Post Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.