I just discovered a mind-blowing connection between electromagnetism, blood flow, and coagulation during my searches on what could be causing blood clots, besides the lies told in the MSM. Check out the latest reports below.
Strong connection between electromagnetism, blood flow and coagulation
The field of hemodynamics is filled with many unknowns and uncertainties. The amount of effort required to move blood through the systemic circulation is greater than the effort exerted by the left ventricle. As a result, blood experiences increased resistance between heartbeats, which can be observed through changes in the Womersley number and the rhythm of the accompanying electrocardiogram (ECG). Coagulation is heavily influenced by viscoelastic transformation.
It is believed that there may be a connection between the resistance of blood flow and ECG readings. In order to study the effects of electromagnetic fields on blood coagulation, an experiment was conducted on 25 healthy individuals (15 males and 10 females, aged 18-57). Venous blood samples were exposed to an oscillating electromagnetic field (500-5000 Hz) with a square wave input signal for a period of 3-10 minutes. The results showed a decrease in platelets (up to 10-23 × 109/L), prothrombin index (up to 9-10%), and fibrinogen concentration (up to 0.20-0.21 g/L) in normal blood samples, as well as thrombolysis after blood stasis. Additionally, the electric field from myocardial depolarization can initiate electroacoustic phenomena.
Did you know that there is a force called the repulsing electromagnetic force that affects red blood cells? This force, along with the pulse pressure from the heart, promotes blood flow and changes in its viscosity and elasticity. The magnetic properties of hemoglobin also play a role in these changes. Interestingly, external electromagnetic signals can even influence the blood coagulation process, including thrombolysis.
FDA lies exposed
It appears that the communication being disseminated to American citizens by our federal government increasingly resembles the dystopian world depicted in George Orwell’s 1984. A prime example is the FDA’s webpage titled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”
Upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that the clinical trials cited by the FDA on the aforementioned page demonstrate contradictory findings.
It may sound absurd, but the FDA states that ivermectin is ineffective against COVID-19. However, in an attempt to support their claim, they refer to studies that suggest otherwise.
